THE IMPORTANCE OF ATTORNEY’S FEES IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES: A LOOK AT LACKEY V. STINNIE
The case of Lackey v. Stinnie, argued on October 8, may not have attracted national headlines, but its implications for civil rights litigation are profound. At the heart of this case is the question of whether plaintiffs in civil rights cases can recover attorney’s...
Heroes Born of Women: Abortion, Servitude, and a People’s Originalism, Installation II
This work is a continuation of: Heroes Born of Women: Abortion, Servitude, and a People’s Originalism, Installation I. Installation I sets out the method of people’s originalism and discusses the challenges faced by originalist methodologies. This second installation...
Heroes Born of Women: Abortion, Servitude, and a People’s Originalism, Installation I
In the last fifty years, originalism has gone from being an obscure academic theory to making national headlines. Notably, the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization[1] relied on the originalist methodology of original public...
Dobbs v. History, Part Two: American Common Law
Lost arguments are not grounds to overrule a case. When proponents of those arguments, greater now in number on the Court, return to fight old battles anew, it betrays an unrestrained disregard for precedent. It fosters the People’s suspicions that “bedrock principles...
Dobbs v. History, Part One: English Common Law
This piece is the first of a four-part series examining how common law and 19th-century statutes support pre-viability abortion as a constitutionally protected right under the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. Part one specifically explores the Court’s analytical missteps in Dobbs’ discussion of historic English Common Law.
“My Ancestors Came Here Legally.” Yes, it was much easier back then.
A modern analysis of my Italian great-grandparents’ journey to the U.S. in the early 20th Century. Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. As long as they are here legally! ...
The Arguments to be Made for Rahimi
I. Background United States v. Rahimi has the potential to greatly affect Second Amendment jurisprudence regarding how courts consider domestic violence restraining orders. See United States v. Rahimi, 217 L.Ed.2d 250 (U.S. 2023). On appeal from the Fifth Circuit,...
Let Labor Speak!
The Unconstitutional Attack on Free Speech by the Nassau County Supreme Court “[T]he problem is not our speech, but their attempts to unjustly intimidate us out of speaking.” - Allie Goodman on the Working People podcast, ALAA UAW 2325 Member In October and...
Democracy Will Not be on the 2024 Ballot in the US Territories
In 2024, many US citizens will cast their votes for president for the first time since the electoral process was marred by election denial and armed insurrection in 2020. These elections come at a time of increased anxiety due in part to concerns about the role of the...
Subscribe by Email
Completely spam free, opt out any time.
This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
