A Framework for Progressive Prosecution

The prosecutor is the lynchpin; ostensibly the first line of defense against petty, unjustified prosecutions that break apart families, send men and women to prison, and spit them out with the tarnish of a criminal record at the end of the process. Using the powerful tool of prosecutorial discretion, these individuals have the power to affect change and, short of changes to the penal code itself, are best able to mete out justice before a case ever makes it to the courtroom.

Why Harvey Weinstein’s Conviction Should Not Be Forgotten in 2021

Harvey Weinstein’s conviction deserves recognition as a story of change and hope for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence everywhere

A Failed Gamble: The Supreme Court’s Affirmation of the Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine in Gamble v. United States

A Failed Gamble: The Supreme Court’s Affirmation of the Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine in Gamble v. United States

“In November 2015, Terrence Gamble was driving in Mobile, Alabama, when he was pulled over by a police officer because of a damaged headlight on his vehicle. Approaching the vehicle, the officer noticed an odor of marijuana emanating from Gamble’s car, leading the officer to search the vehicle. The officer’s search uncovered a loaded nine-millimeter handgun. Because of Gamble’s prior conviction for second-degree robbery, he was arrested for violating Alabama’s felon-in-possession statute, which provides that no person convicted of “a crime of violence” “shall own a firearm or have one in his or her possession.” Gamble pled guilty to the offense. In most criminal cases, this is where the story ends. A sentence is imposed, a judgment is entered, and no further proceedings take place. This, however, was not the average criminal case.”

Disclaimer

GW Law School hosts this blog as a service to the GW Law Student Community to provide additional educational opportunities for student creative expression. It is law student-created and nothing on it constitutes or is intended to constitute legal advice. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the individuals who created the content; they are not the views of GW Law School, GW University or any other GW affiliate. GW Law School makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the site’s operation or the information, content, or materials included on this site.